While Arie Kaplan’s book, From Krakow to Krypton: Jews and Comic Books is not a comic book, it does offer a lot of great illustrations throughout. These visuals really help a person get a feel for the kind of comic book art that was occurring during the Golden Age of comic books. For that reason, this book is an interesting history of comic books. And while it gives some perspective on the beginnings of comic books in the 1930s, it also left me with some questions unanswered.
Kaplan offers a sort of cautionary tale of three young comic book artists/writers who were the geniuses behind two legendary superheroes, Batman and Superman. While Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster created Superman, arguable the most recognized comic book superhero ever, it was only much later in their lives when they get the credit they deserve for influencing pop culture for decades. The comic book system from the 1930s to the 1950s did not recognize the individual artists for their work nor where they properly compensated for the work they did for the comic book publishers. Most of the illustrators and writers did not share in the profits that their work generated for their publishers. While most of the artists were denied credit by their employers, some had credit for their work stolen by a fellow comic artist. Bill Finger is one such example of this. Bill Finger came up with many of the ideas that have become part of Batman’s mystique, including the memorable villain, The Joker. Yet it is Bob Kane who claims the credit for all things Batman. These are just a few examples of this kind of treatment in the comic book industry. Why was this allowed to happen?
The early part of the 20th century was known for discussion and protest over many social causes, the issue of worker’s rights and unions being just one of them, and many Jews were a part of those causes. So, why wasn’t there more protest about the exploitation of the young Jewish men that worked in the comic book industry? Yes, this was happening during the Great Depression when many people were out of work. But, many workers in other industries during this time were going on strike for better wages and working conditions. Why were these men willing to take such exploitation when many of them would have been willing to jump at helping change other social injustices?